Advertisement

Interior watchdog finds $40 million in misclassified IT purchases

Misclassification makes it harder to track IT spending, could result in redundant purchases, and increases the risk of breaches and vulnerabilities, the OIG report said.
Listen to this article
0:00
Learn more. This feature uses an automated voice, which may result in occasional errors in pronunciation, tone, or sentiment.
Department of the Interior
(Tajha Chappellet-Lanier / FedScoop)

The Department of the Interior didn’t classify millions of dollars worth of purchases as IT when it should have, posing acquisition and security risks, the agency’s internal watchdog found.

In a review of roughly 167 purchases totaling $52 million dollars that had been recorded as “other” in the agency’s business management system, the DOI’s Office of Inspector General said it found 98 were not appropriately classified as IT. Those misclassified purchases total nearly $40 million.

“Because the purchases were misclassified, they were not routed as required for IT approval,” Nicki Miller, assistant inspector general for audits, inspections, and evaluations, wrote in a memo to Chief Information Officer Paul McInerny dated Monday. 

“Appropriate IT approval must take place to ensure consistency with bureau acquisition strategies and plans and verify the funds are available,” she said. 

Advertisement

Misclassified purchases that didn’t receive necessary approval included software, landline phones, Wi-Fi, and IT consulting or contractor support, according to a list of the purchases included in the report.

Though the issues represent a fraction of the agency’s estimated $1.9 billion in spending on IT purchases annually, the report indicated they can still pose broader issues.

Failure to classify correctly makes it difficult for the CIO’s office to track IT purchasing accurately, could result in the agency making redundant purchases, and increases the risk of breaches and vulnerabilities if those purchases don’t meet cyber requirements, Miller said. 

As a result, the OIG made several recommendations, including that the CIO’s office develop and provide training on product codes for IT purchase requests, as well as requiring all bureaus that were affected to create a process to review purchase requests classified as “other.”

In a response to the findings  included in the report, McInerny thanked the watchdog for the opportunity to review a draft of the report and agreed with all of the recommended actions.

Advertisement

“The information contained in the report will assist us in successfully moving forward with the improvements to our IT Acquisitions processes throughout the Department,” McInerny said. “The Interior/OCIO leadership understands the importance of strengthening the Department’s oversight over IT spending.”

Madison Alder

Written by Madison Alder

Madison Alder is a reporter for FedScoop in Washington, D.C., covering government technology. Her reporting has included tracking government uses of artificial intelligence and monitoring changes in federal contracting. She’s broadly interested in issues involving health, law, and data. Before joining FedScoop, Madison was a reporter at Bloomberg Law where she covered several beats, including the federal judiciary, health policy, and employee benefits. A west-coaster at heart, Madison is originally from Seattle and is a graduate of the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication at Arizona State University.

Latest Podcasts