Is artificial intelligence a threat? Experts weigh the risks
July 02, 2015
As several tech luminaries express worries about the future of AI, researchers met at a D.C. think tank to discuss whether advances could pose a threat.
David Stegon was a staff reporter for FedScoop and StateScoop from 2011-2014.
Open source continues to be used in new and innovative ways as federal agencies become more comfortable with the software development philosophy that helps solve common problems with common solutions, said Red Hat Vice President and General Manager of U.S. Public Sector Paul Smith.
Smith’s comments came Tuesday as a kickoff to the Red Hat Government Symposium, produced by FedScoop, at the Newseum where more than 600 attendees convened to discuss lessons learned from implementing open source solutions in an event that featured nearly 40 speakers and panelists.
“If there’s one lesson that has become clear, it’s that mission-critical IT demands at all levels of the government require freedom and choice,” Smith said. “The high costs, high risk and elusive returns of proprietary software just don’t make sense for the government’s biggest IT challenges.”
Speaking in part for the intelligence community, Dawn Meyerriecks, deputy director of National Intelligence for Acquisition, Technology and Facilities at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, said the intelligence community needs open source and open standards in order to compete with the Chinese.
“We are literally out-manned and out-gunned,” Meyerriecks said. “We can attract smart people, but it's not enough. The truth is, bright ideas don’t come just from your community, but from creating ways that others can get involved and lend their expertise to your problems and think about them in new ways.”
Meyerriecks said that because of the intelligence community’s unique mission and different levels of secure information that it must, by nature, be secretive much of the time as lives are at stake. However, the community has opportunities in areas like business and competitive intelligence that can be better leveraged through a large community.
“We have to be secretive, but we don’t have to be mysterious,” she said.
Dan Risacher, associate director for Information Enterprise Strategy and Police in the office of the Department of Defense chief information officer, referenced Sun Tzu and The Art of War as it relates to open source. Sun Tzu said agility wins and wars and, in the case of federal technology, open source enhances agility.
Risacher added that open source provides the ability for peer review that was previously unavailable and that open source can adapt to missions much faster than proprietary software which updates on the vendor’s schedule – not DOD’s.
Chris Willey, CIO of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, issued a challenge to all federal agencies, asking them to make use of and contribute to the CFPB’s code. He added that the CFPB is applying open source methodology to the rule-making process of the new agency.
Douglas Maughan, director of the Cyber Security Division at the Department of Homeland Security, said DHS wants to document the use of open source in the civilian government to see what is working and what hasn’t, although he admits the civilian government is way behind its military counterparts.
“The reality is that the DOD and .mil space is about 10 years ahead of the .gov community when it comes to open source technologies and adoption,” he said.
He added that government needs to be in the open source community and should not be any different than any other contributor or user. To that extent, he said DHS is looking at funding open source projects through its R&D arm, like Suricata.
Securities Exchange Commission CIO Tom Bayer said the SEC has more than 50 applications in the cloud. The elastic storage and bandwidth allowed by cloud has been beneficial in dealing with major online inquiries of the agency as was the case with the Facebook initial public offering.
“Open elastic storage provides more flexibility in costs as well and prevents a build-up of hardware and systems costs,” Bayer said.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office CIO John Owens said he leans toward agile development as he doesn’t have time for lengthy and arduous processes.
“It’s not about ‘the cloud,’” Owens said, “it’s about finding the right cloud environment for the job.”